What's Wrong with Same-Sex or 'Gay' Marriage?


What's Wrong with Same-Sex or 'Gay' Marriage?

by Seth Brotherton

For a more extensive debate see Homosexuality and the 'Gay Christian'

Answer

In order to answer this question we must ask, "What is the purpose of the sexual organs?" The reason why we must ask this question will be evident later on. Now, the purpose of something can be determined by how it is formed or structured. For instance, by examining the nature of a watch we can determine that the purpose of a watch is to tell the time of day.

Also, something is acting wrongly if it is not acting in accord with the intention of the designer of that object. For instance, if a watch did not tell the time of day, or if one of its wheels moved in the wrong direction (thus, throwing off its whole course), it is acting wrongly.

Indeed, the human body is much more complicated than a watch, so it too must have a designer. And man too must act in accord with the intention of his designer, i.e. God. This brings us to the question "What was God’s intention in giving us sexual organs?" Anyone who seriously examines this question must answer "Reproduction." The process of human gestation is so extremely complex, that it cannot be the result of chance, but rather of design. Who could deny that the reproductive organs are designed for reproduction?

Therefore, any sexual act that excludes the possibility of reproduction is not in accord with the intentions of the Supreme Designer, and is an evil act. This includes homosexual acts. Therefore, any sexual relation between people of the same sex is immoral. This obviously includes marriage.

Common Objections

Objection #1

But homosexuals and heterosexuals are equals, so they both should be able to marry who they love.

Reply

Yes, homosexuals and heterosexuals are equals, and so they have the same rights. Both of them have the right to marry people of the opposite sex, and neither of them have the right to marry people of the same sex. Just because homosexuals have a 'sexual orientation' of being attracted to people of the same sex, that’s not an excuse to act on it.

Objection #2

But homosexuality is natural to man, since even animals, e.g. monkeys, perform homosexual acts.

Reply

First of all, even though they do this, they definitely don’t do it exclusively. Second of all, if you want to be a monkey, go ahead. But, since we are human beings we should act as human beings, not as monkeys.

Objection #3

But even homosexuals say that they were born that way, therefore it is natural.

Reply

First of all, we demonstrated that it is unnatural from reason, which is more trustworthy than human testimony. Second of all, nobody knows anything when they’re born. The only thing they know is that they have had this 'orientation' as long as they can remember. No one can be created this way. If they were that would mean that God’s all wise providence contradicted itself, which is impossible. On the one hand we would have God creating sexual organs for reproduction, and on the other not for reproduction. Furthermore, if homosexuality is just as natural as heterosexuality, why is it not as common?

Objection #4

But priests and nuns don’t accomplish their purposes of reproduction, so are they sinning also?

Reply

No, they are not. No one has the obligation of reproducing. The purpose of the sexual organs is reproduction, but the purpose of reproduction is the survival of the species (this is why it is a natural appetite). Since, it is not necessary for everyone to reproduce in order to preserve the species, we don’t have an obligation to reproduce. However, if someone were to have sex they cannot intentionally exclude the possibility of reproduction (NFP is not included since the impossibility of reproduction is not intended, but only temporarily permitted).

Seth Brotherton

See also Why Marriage Matters: The Case for Normal (One Man and One Woman) Marriage by Maggie Gallagher

The Bible, Tradition, and the Catechism on Homosexuality, Sexual Morality, and Marriage

Homosexuals are Not 'Born Gay' : Evidence from Science and History

For a more extensive debate see Homosexuality and the 'Gay Christian'

See also these scholarly books and debates on the subject:

The Abolition of Marriage: How We Destroy Lasting Love
by Maggie Gallagher (Regnery Publishing, 1996)

The Case for Marriage: Why Married People are Happier, Healthier and Better Off Financially
by Linda Waite and Maggie Gallagher (Broadway Books, 2001)

Debating Same-Sex Marriage (Point/Counterpoint)
by John Corvino and Maggie Gallagher (Oxford Univ Press, 2012)

What Is Marriage?: Man and Woman: A Defense
by Sherif Girgis, Ryan Anderson, Robert George (Encounter Books, 2012)

Redeeming the Dream: The Case for Marriage Equality
by David Boies and Theodore B. Olson (Viking, 2014)


Back to Philosophy Articles

Back to Home Page

About | Apologetics | Philosophy | Spirituality | Books | Audio | Links